Rise to the Challenge: Klever Hackathon Winners' Roadmap! šŸš€

Congratulations on the excellent result! Pandemic Games is a really working project with an active audience. I wish you further success and even greater development!

5 Likes

@Duka is there an official evaluation for milestone III yet?
And I read in a klever post that the KVM is now planned for Q1 2025. does this affect the Milestone IV or did I misunderstand that?

2 Likes

Yep Bro. Iā€™m evaluating the reports and data from whom has send to me.

And yes again, weā€™ll need to change a little the Milestone IV. Iā€™ll let yā€™all know soon

5 Likes

Calling all competitor. Iā€™m about to start the evaluation of the data. I need that the data was be send by you to me. For DM or email.

Please, pay attention on this situation, if you donā€™t share a way to me to see or send a report to me, do it just now!

Remember yā€™all need to a convincing proof that these transactions are made by or for your product (only hackathonā€™s winner)

7 Likes

Hey @Duka :raised_hands:
Anything new yet?
Since we give a part back to our players and users because we owe them the success, it would be interesting to know when we can expect the winnings

4 Likes

Hey my friend, how have you been? As a usual, we need up 10 business days to evaluate and pay the prizes. I intend to get all of this done by the end of this week. :facepunch:

3 Likes

All good here, thanks :raised_hands:
This sounds great!
Thanks for the feedback :+1:

6 Likes

Hey everyoneā€¦ quick question regarding the required transactions!
We (and surely you too) get a lot of transactions from the current drops / event of Mathijs (gohan + pharao) and the KFI that are sent by Klever for every transaction that is performed by us.
Do I have to deduct these transactions from the evaluation (Gohan, Pharaoh + KFI) to reach the 300k for milestone 4?
After all, it is a reward that we earn by generating the transactions. :face_with_peeking_eye: :stuck_out_tongue:

5 Likes

A new day, a new question :face_with_peeking_eye: :stuck_out_tongue:
Will there be a new version of the C# /Unity SDK in the near future with which we can trigger the smart contracts in the testnet?
Would of course be great if we could implement our contracts directly ingame (even if in the testnet).
Or is only the pure creation of the contract and the acceptance by the Kleverteam necessary without a full implementation in our apps?

1 Like

Hello my friend, how have you been? Great questionsā€¦ letā€™s break it down.

  1. Transactions ā†’ Only transactions made for your projects will be considered.

These ā€œdropsā€ havenā€™t done by your projects (even though it is a consequence of this).

  1. KVM Smart Contract ā†’ Yep, the SM created by your have to integrate with your project (hackathonā€™s winner). And yes, our C# Unity SDK already support SM on KVM (testnet), you can ger more datils at Klever C# SDK Documentation

:fire: :rocket:

3 Likes

Ah great, Iā€™ve just seen it.
I still had the old kleversdk.dll version in there.
Thanks for your answer :raised_hands:

2 Likes

@Duka

Can you provide us with a header for the CSV so that we also know how the CSV must be arranged for the transaction statement.

For example:

timestamp;owneraddress;hash;type;metadata

or something like this

3 Likes

Yo man.

Sure thing. You can use your example itself.

timestamp(UTC);owneraddress;hash;type;metadata

:facepunch:

@Duka we are currently working on the evaluation!

unfortunately there is a bug in the API which affects direct access and Kleverscan!

As soon as an end date is specified, there are no more transactions returned!

See here with end date:

https://api.mainnet.klever.finance/v1.0/address/klv1t29xhtzqnzc3wkqg9u0r22jyxn44tsgu7w60as3s0p3eqql8fx4qgzk2uu/transactions?account=klv1t29xhtzqnzc3wkqg9u0r22jyxn44tsgu7w60as3s0p3eqql8fx4qgzk2uu&limit=100&page=1&startdate=1731931200&enddate=1731945600

without end date:

https://api.mainnet.klever.finance/v1.0/address/klv1t29xhtzqnzc3wkqg9u0r22jyxn44tsgu7w60as3s0p3eqql8fx4qgzk2uu/transactions?account=klv1t29xhtzqnzc3wkqg9u0r22jyxn44tsgu7w60as3s0p3eqql8fx4qgzk2uu&limit=100&page=1&startdate=1731931200

Weā€™ll check it ASAP mate. TY for sharing with us

1 Like

Yo mate,

So, it is a timestamp mismatch. Could you change the timestamp in your call to milliseconds instead? Probably it will quick fix your question.

We have to create a standard for it, and will do. :facepunch:

TY

2 Likes

thanks will try it out :raised_hands:

3 Likes

That works, thank you!

3 Likes