Whyw the Token Holder Community Is a Myth?

General Discussions
1

Whyw the Token Holder Community Is a Myth?

  1. Speculative Nature of Holders

Token holders are often driven by short-term gains: price surges, listings on major exchanges, or pumps. Their interest in a project is frequently purely financial, not tied to the mission, product, or long-term development. When prices drop or a “hotter” opportunity arises, these holders leave. This makes the “community” of holders unstable and fragmented.

  1. Lack of a Unified Goal

Token holders have diverse motives: some chase “quick x’s,” others hold tokens for DAO voting, while some simply forget about their investments. This isn’t a community in the traditional sense but rather a group of people with different interests, united only by asset ownership. There’s no cohesion or shared ideology.

  1. Passivity

Most token holders are passive. They don’t contribute to the project’s development, propose ideas, or test the product. Their involvement is limited to buying the token, which adds no value to the ecosystem. In this case, the “community” of holders is more an abstraction than a real force.

  1. Manipulation and Toxicity

Token holder communities often breed manipulation (e.g., panic from FUD or hype before news). This creates a toxic environment where discussions revolve around token price rather than the project’s actual value. Such communities rarely engage in constructive dialogue.

Why the User Community Is the Key to Success?

  1. Real Value Through Usage

Users are those who actively engage with the product: they use decentralized applications (dApps), pay for services, test features, and provide feedback. Their activity directly impacts the project’s development, product improvement, and market adaptation. Without users, any token is just an empty asset.

  1. Organic Growth and Loyalty

Users who find real value in a product become its advocates. They recommend the project to others, share experiences, and attract new audiences. This creates organic growth, far more sustainable than artificial hype around a token.

  1. Feedback and Innovation

The user community is a source of ideas and suggestions. They see how the product works in practice and can highlight weaknesses or propose new features. For example, in blockchain projects like Ethereum or Solana, users (dApp developers, DeFi participants) have shaped the ecosystem’s direction.

  1. Long-Term Sustainability

A project focused on users is more likely to survive market volatility. If the product solves a real problem, users will stay even if the token price drops. In contrast, holder communities often dissolve in such conditions.

Deep Analysis: Holders vs. Users

Economic Perspective

  • Holders often view tokens as investments, not tools for use. This creates an imbalance: projects must divert resources to marketing and hype to prop up token prices instead of focusing on the product.
  • Users generate demand for the token through real usage. For example, in DeFi protocols like Aave or Uniswap, tokens are used for transaction fees, voting, or staking, making them integral to the ecosystem, not just speculative assets.

Social Dynamics

  • Holders often form communities on Discord, Telegram, or X, where discussions devolve into “when moon?” or “why dump?” This noise drowns out constructive ideas.
  • Users tend to engage more deeply. For instance, in open-source projects (like blockchain protocol GitHub repositories), users actively contribute to development, bug reports, and documentation.

Real-Life Examples

  • Bitcoin: Bitcoin’s community began with enthusiasts using it as a medium of exchange (users). Over time, speculators and holders dominated, but users (miners, developers, businesses) ensured the network’s resilience.
  • Ethereum: Ethereum’s success stems from dApp developers and DeFi/NFT users, not those merely holding ETH. Users built the ecosystem that made ETH valuable.
  • Dogecoin: A classic example of a holder-driven community. Dogecoin thrives on hype and memes, but with minimal real users (except for rare payment use cases), its value remains speculative.

How Can Projects Shift Focus to Users?

  1. Build a Useful Product
    A project must solve a real problem. For example, Chainlink provides oracles for smart contracts, making it valuable for thousands of dApps. This attracts users, not just holders.
  2. Inclusivity and Accessibility
    Simplify product interaction. If using a dApp requires understanding Metamask, gas fees, and smart contracts, the user base will be limited. Successful projects like Polygon or Arbitrum lower entry barriers.
  3. Engagement Mechanisms
    Reward users for activity: grants for developers, incentives for testing, or ambassador programs. This builds a loyal community that works for the project’s benefit.
  4. Transparency and Feedback
    Regularly communicate with users, collect their feedback, and share roadmaps. This fosters trust and makes the community part of the process.

Counterarguments: Why Holders Still Matter?

  1. Funding
    Token holders (especially during ICOs/IDOs) provide projects with initial capital. Without them, many projects couldn’t launch.
  2. Liquidity
    Active holders trading tokens create liquidity, which is crucial for DeFi protocols and exchanges.
  3. DAO Voting
    In decentralized organizations, token holders participate in governance. Without them, the DAO model wouldn’t function.

However, these points only highlight that holders play a supporting role. Their contribution is important, but without users, a project lacks a foundation.

The Future: Merging Holders and Users

The ideal scenario is when holders become users. For example, in ecosystems like Cosmos or Polkadot, holders often stake tokens, participate in network validation, or use tokens to pay for services. This creates synergy: the token becomes not just an investment but a tool for engaging with the ecosystem.

Projects can encourage this merger through:

  • Tokenomics where the token is required to use the product (e.g., $LINK for Chainlink oracles).
  • Loyalty Programs where active users receive tokens.
  • Education to help holders understand how to use the product, not just store the token.

Conclusion

The token holder community is a myth if we imagine it as a cohesive group with a shared purpose. It’s often fragmented, speculative, and unstable. In contrast, the user community is the real force that drives a project forward through active participation, feedback, and value creation. Projects should focus on attracting users rather than fueling token hype. In the future, the best projects will be those that unite holders and users into a single ecosystem, where the token is not just an asset but a key to a valuable product.